In typical internet backlash, the Apple patent victory this week over Samsung’s Galaxy copy of the iPhone has its ardent vocal detractors.
But the jury said “Are you kidding me?” THIS was a cell phone before Apple:
Apple invested 4 ½ years and enormous amounts of money to make phones look and work like this instead:
Consumers liked them. It turned telecom design on a dime.
According to evidence and testimony, Samsung invested about 4 months and a comparative pittance and hit the market with this:
Hm.
Now Samsung has to pay Apple a bit more than a $billion and do what Apple did in the first place...that is...
...invest years of work and enormous amounts of money to figure out a next gen phone that works differently from the iPhone and is INSANELY BETTER. That’s how you take a market back.
25labs.com
That’s competition. That’s how great products leapfrog each other and how patent spurs innovation.
If Samsung is smart, they’ll go back and do just that.
"People who want to play jazz actually outnumber those who enjoy or even tolerate it, let alone pay to hear it."
Wow. For me, that was hard to read.
A pianist, Bill Anschell, offered that to AllAboutJazz.com in an article he wrote about the diminishing opportunities in our American musical idiom.
He was hard on the state of the musical industry in general.
He identified "Gig Whores" (who will play any music at any venue with any lame band in order to pay the rent)
Also "Jazz Educators" (who train musicians who, unable to make a living performing, become jazz educators themselves, thus perpetrating a vicious cycle.)
And the "Arts Administrator" (one who "Diverts and sucks dry the scant dollars that governmental agencies and charitable foundations earmark for jazz artists.)
Ouch.
This jazz band “Tin Pan” is gutty and wonderful fun,
and clearly following their hearts.
"What most of us turn to music for is an emotional experience."
That’s what neuroscientist Daniel Levitin wrote in his book "This Is Your Brain on Music: The Science of a Human Obsession."